Meeting Minutes

STEWARDSHIP PLANNING WORKGROUP
 

Date: June 16, 2003
Time: 1:50 PM – 3:40 PM
Place: Santa Clara Valley Watershed District
5750 Almaden Expressway
San Jose, CA
Room: Old Boardroom
Next Meeting: July 28, 2003
I.

Attendance List

External Stakeholders SCVWD Staff Consultant Team

Kristy McCumby Hyland
Luisa Valiela
James Downing
Trish Mulvey
Lorrie Gervin
Mondy Lariz
Richard McMurtry

Sarah Young
Al Gurevich
Terry Neudorf
Jason Christie
Pat Showalter
Michael Martin
Scott Akin
Sandy Olbonsky
Clayton Creager
II.

Stakeholder Input to the Scope of Services Draft

 
Sarah debriefed the group about the Coyote Stream Stewardship Planning effort, information contained in the plan, lessons learned, new platform for this round of watershed plans, including the formalization of District’s watershed stewardship responsibilities, the settlement on the various collaborative efforts, the Santa Clara Basin Watershed Action Plan, and the interests from the Water Resources Protection Collaborative.

She then went over the Scope of Services document distributed among the group members.
    1. Clarify that the compilation of the compendium document would not include a         separate CEQA process or an elaborate public process.
    2. Recognize that the Water Supply and Water Utility Operations are system-based,         rather than watershed based. However, operational linkages and or connections,         or creek-specific implications can be identified on watershed basis. Additionally, it         is important to recognize that other stakeholders (e.g., Water Companies) may         need to be engaged for addressing water supply or water utility issues.
    3. Recognize the importance that methodology used would allow understanding of         the water resources natural regime in a comprehensive and integrated way;         opportunities/constraints are identified in an integrated way.
    4. Recognize that it is important to bring watershed-specific focus to the planning         process, which included the following:
         - Cover all streams w/ varying scale
         - Understand data gaps
         - Prioritize filling of data gaps - Provide some detailed subset analysis e.g.,            steven’s creek
    5. Recognize the importance of engaging planning staff from cities or counties,          avenues for such engagement may include:
         - Bring the stewardship plan to Water Resources Protection Collaborative,            particularly, the planning staff.
         - make the Watershed Stewardship Plan an integrated and coordinated piece of            what’s happening rather than a separate effort, with related planning efforts            such as the Hydromodification Management Plan.
         - City environmental staff bring updates and alert their planning staff of the            Stewardship Planning work through their staff-level coordination meetings.
         - Make sure that we have actual GIS product rather than thematic maps            generated from a GIS. It's important to allow outside stakeholders to access            the GIS product.
    6. Offer opportunities for getting information on Steven's Creek
    Trish Mulvey also pointed out that the Collaborative needs to find resources for     devising stewardship plan for the South County watershed areas.